Specifically, I've added:
- Risk-based adjustment based on host importance. Some hosts are obviously more important than others. Perimeter-facing mission-critical boxes score individually higher than internal utility servers behind 3 layers of firewalls. To do this, I had to modify the database and add new fields. Luckily with SQLite, this was a snap.
- Scoring based on type of vulnerability service. Vulnerabilities that require local access (such as a browser vuln) score lower on servers than external service type of vulnerability does. Bonus risk points for an external service discovered on what should be a client box.... laptops should not have listening FTP servers on them!
- New report on total number of vulnerabilities and total risk score per host. Handy for
shaminginformative reports to asset owners. - New report on total number of listening services per host. Good for seeing which boxes are leaving large footprints on your networks. And singling out unusual looking devices. Both have proved very "interesting" when reviewed. Also good to compare to asset master lists to see if you missed scanning anything.
- New report on vulnerabilities based on keyword name in description. This lets me create useful pie charts on which vendors are causing the most number of vulnerabilities in our environment. So far these reports haven't been that revelatory:
That's all I've got for now. I'm still working on integrating this into our on-going threat and IDS data streams.
No comments:
Post a Comment