tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7098426205010328379.post3837910065039241610..comments2023-08-20T02:19:46.390-07:00Comments on Assuming the breach: Peter Sandman and risk communicationPlanet Heidihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07887831060071362491noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7098426205010328379.post-68720417120648132682011-01-24T16:33:01.932-08:002011-01-24T16:33:01.932-08:00He's a brilliant communicator.
I use his grap...He's a brilliant communicator.<br /><br />I use his graph (outrage and hazard on the axes) when explaining to my executive why we need to communicate in a particular way.<br /><br />I've done a lot of comms for emergency planners for oil and gas work (low hazard, high outrage) and his lessons have been a godsend.Stealthy Dachshundhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09123183195160953752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7098426205010328379.post-17472134255042063172011-01-24T07:22:18.057-08:002011-01-24T07:22:18.057-08:00hi. I have a google search alert for 'risk com...hi. I have a google search alert for 'risk communication' and came across your post. I am a fan and student of Peter's. I also teach and write about risk communication, and advocate a similar but somewhat unique approach, based on a richer understanding of the psychology behind people's perceptions. That psychology has been studied in depth and really helps with the challenge of communicating risk, which is why I wrote the book "How Risky Is It, Really? Why Our Fears Don't Always Match the Facts". Your post suggests you and your readers and field might find it useful.David Ropeikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06380740759704570812noreply@blogger.com